Doom or Bloom

What it does

Doom or Bloom is a quiz tool that maps respondents' views on artificial intelligence's future impact. Users answer a set of questions and receive results showing whether their worldview leans toward catastrophic outcomes (doom) or beneficial outcomes (bloom). The quiz also displays a probability estimate and compares the user's position against named figures in AI and technology—including researchers, executives, and public intellectuals.

Who it is for

The tool targets anyone interested in forming or testing their own perspective on AI's trajectory. The founder emphasizes this is "a really important question for everyone to be asking themselves." The comparison feature against named thinkers suggests the tool appeals to people curious how their views align with prominent voices in AI safety, AI development, and related fields.

Pricing

Free. The tool is described as open source and does not indicate any paid tier or premium features.

How it stands out

The core differentiator is the comparison mechanic. Rather than just scoring a user's position, the quiz maps them against named individuals spanning different viewpoints—from AI safety researchers like Eliezer Yudkowsky to AI lab leaders like Sam Altman and Yann LeCun. The interface visualizes positions on what appears to be a two-axis spectrum: civilizational change (doom to bloom) and rate of change (incremental to rapid). This creates a social comparison feature that goes beyond typical opinion surveys. The founder also emphasizes the project is open source and private by default, addressing transparency and privacy concerns.

What a founder should check

A founder building a rival should verify: First, whether the quiz's positioning framework (the two axes shown) accurately captures the nuance needed to differentiate real disagreement on AI futures, or if the model oversimplifies views too much to be useful beyond a novelty. Second, whether the named figures' actual positions are accurately placed—placing someone incorrectly could create credibility damage and raise questions about how positions are determined. Third, whether there is sustained engagement beyond the novelty of taking a quiz once; most quiz-style tools see one-time usage spikes, so a founder should understand what brings users back or keeps them engaged.